In every election of an organization, being unable to
reach higher position, some people often say “I do not need that position, so
anyone can be chosen as the leader” and easily vote the suggested person. This
kind of person is often known to be “a bad compromise is better than a good
most people have misunderstandings of “a bad compromise is better than a good
lawsuit”. The voter forces them to do what they do not want or do not care
their benefits. In other words, what
seems out of their interest make them feel angry and disobedient in silence.
Therefore, it is believed that the voter has to serve for the sake of the
votees. On the contrary, the voter is for the sake of the upper level.
Meanwhile, the others still want to follow their own way of life.
instance, in a pack of monkeys, the leading monkey is voted because of not only
its strength for remaining its spring but also its ability to keep the order of
its pack. Thus, its main role is not to seek fruits or vegetables for the other
monkeys. Moreover, each monkey has to feed itself in the order of its pack
while this order offers their chances of living. Of course, each monkey has to
comply with the power of the leading monkey.
this practice, to my point of view, the power of Human should learn experiences
from the power of monkeys. More specifically, the power is to keep and enhance
the strength but is not to satisfy the free lifestyle.